| 
						  
						 
						Sundance Buzz: A Pair of Wild Cards 
						Sam Shepard and Wim Wenders talk about their unique 
						artistic partnership and their latest work, DON'T COME 
						KNOCKING 
						 
						 
						DON'T COME KNOCKING, one of the closing movies of the 
						Sundance Film Festival, which ended Sunday, is the story 
						of Howard Spence, a washed up bad-boy star of Westerns, 
						who makes a last ditch effort to reconnect with the 
						people who genuinely love him. The film, which was shot 
						in small towns in Utah, Nevada and Montana and will be 
						released by Sony Pictures Classics on March 17, reunites 
						German director Wim Wenders and American 
						playwright/actor Sam Shepard, two icons of the 
						independent art world who first teamed up for the 
						acclaimed PARIS, TEXAS (1984). They spoke to TIME about 
						their creative process.  
						 
						TIME: What does this movie say about how long it can 
						take to find yourself?  
						 
						SAM SHEPARD: I don’t know. That’s an ongoing process 
						don’t you think? I don’t think it ever gets resolved. I 
						think it takes a lifetime, if not more.  
						 
						WIM WENDERS: I’m not so sure if that’s what we were 
						trying to focus on, though it’s a side issue and it’s an 
						important issue. Howard is himself until he realizes the 
						only problem with his life is that he didn’t have it. 
						He’d missed most of it. A lot of it.  
						 
						SS: I don’t think Howard ever thinks he has a life. I 
						think he is eternally lost. At the point where this 
						movie begins I think he comes closer to not kidding 
						himself about having a life than he ever has. He really 
						realizes he’s at a dead end. Nothing has led anywhere.
						 
						 
						WW: My focus was always the realization because I can 
						relate to that. He wakes up and realizes if he would 
						have died that night nobody would have cried or mourned 
						him and that is a sad thing to realize, that nobody is 
						going to miss you.  
						 
						TIME: What is it like for you two to work together?  
						 
						WW (laughs): Oh that’s a huge question. I don’t think 
						you can define such a complex relationship as a director 
						and a writer and being friends and then he is also 
						acting in the movie. I’m very, very fond that I met Sam 
						a long time ago. I’ve actually worked more with 
						novelists than screenwriters and I think it’s not a 
						coincidence that Sam is really a playwright. He hasn’t 
						written all that many scripts…  
						 
						SS: Screenplays? Few.  
						 
						WW: So he sits there, he types. We always write 
						together. Sam doesn’t really like writing when I’m not 
						around. I don’t really know why that is. No, I know why 
						that is because when he is finished with the scene, we 
						talk about it and then the question is what’s next? I 
						don’t know anybody else who works like this. Sam writes 
						in total chronological order. We start with the first 
						scene not knowing what the second scene is, and when we 
						write the second scene we think about the third scene. 
						So you really sort of live through the story. And 
						everything comes out of the character. Nothing is 
						because of fluff. It’s such a relief when you can just 
						think about your characters and the story comes out of 
						it.  
						 
						TIME: What kind of characters would you say you’re 
						attracted to writing?  
						 
						SS: I’m drawn to loss-ness of a certain kind, aloneness. 
						Which is not peculiar to a lot of writers. Many writers 
						use that as their stepping-off place because I think one 
						thing that writers share in common is this sense of 
						aloneness. Of somehow or another being cut off, being 
						outside, and somehow having to communicate through 
						writing. That’s the need for writing. And I find the 
						characters I write also have that quality, of being 
						somewhat or very much removed from the mainstream of 
						life, and don’t know quite how to find themselves in 
						society. Outsiders I guess. Not in any kind of 
						fashionable way, but a real remoteness from the 
						mainstream.  
						 
						WW: What I have to say about that is when I made my 
						first movies and I showed them in America in art houses, 
						all my American reviews were about the same thing. They 
						all said ‘this Wim Wenders guy, his movies are about 
						Angst, Alienation and America.’ So I called myself a 
						triple A director. (laughter)  
						 
						TIME: You’re both known as people who get your work out, 
						whether it falls outside or within the commercial realm. 
						Do you ever think about where your film might end up?
						 
						 
						SS: I never think about that. If you get wrapped up in 
						whether it’s independent or commercial I think you’re on 
						the wrong track. You have to follow the thing that you 
						want to pursue because if you’re not committed to what 
						you’re doing, personally, then it doesn’t make any sense 
						whether it’s commercial or not, or independent. You’ve 
						got to be attached to material in a very integral way.
						 
						 
						WW: I think the very classification, the word 
						independent means you want to express yourself and you 
						don’t look at it under an industrial sort of aspect, and 
						success is an industrial aspect. I mean you want to have 
						success, you want to reach people but the beauty of 
						making films like Sam and I are doing is we just want to 
						tell a story and we come up with something that is close 
						to us and that we want to do. And then hopefully we 
						touch something that people can relate to.  
						 
						SS: One of the great things as a writer working with Wim 
						is I know for sure that this is going to be turned into 
						a movie. I don’t know how many screenplays I’ve sat down 
						to work with that never become movies. Working with Wim 
						I know one way or another, it may take five or ten 
						years, but down the road it’s going to be a movie. And 
						it’s a wonderful feeling because you know what you’re 
						writing is not going to be in vain. It’s not going to go 
						through that Hollywood process of being looked at by a 
						committee. It’s just between me and him  
						 
						TIME: You, Sam Shepard, are known as a very iconic 
						American writer, good at capturing the American 
						experience. And you, Billy Turner…  
						 
						WW (to SS): I told her my name in English is Bill 
						Turner. Wim is short for William, so Bill. Wenders means 
						winding, to turn. So my English name would be Bill 
						Turner.  
						 
						SS (to WW): Do you use that in hotels?  
						 
						WW: No, but I should.  
						 
						SS: Billy Turner. It’s a good character name.  
						 
						TIME: Wim, what’s it like being a European/American 
						director?  
						 
						WW: I think I’m a European director. I love America. 
						I’ve lived here for a long time. But when I first came 
						and made my first movie in America I realized I was not 
						an American director and I was never going to be an 
						American director. And that freed me to be able to look 
						at America in my own way. And I do think if you are a 
						foreigner that you have a privileged view of things. I 
						like that position. It’s obvious in my films how much I 
						love America but I don’t think that I have an American 
						point of view and I think that works well with Sam’s 
						writing. There’s a certain detachment. Because I’m 
						German in my heart, and a hopeless romantic therefore, I 
						think that maybe enables me to look at some places in 
						America in a way that maybe Americans don’t get to do 
						anymore. I don’t know why a single American director 
						never made a movie in Butte, Montana because that town…
						 
						 
						SS: It’s like a movie set.  
						 
						WW: It needed, somehow, a German to arrive there.  
						 
						TIME: For a while it did seem like directors were 
						interested in making regional films but now everything 
						has sort of drifted back to locations in Los Angeles or 
						Toronto. Is something missing?  
						 
						SS: As an actor I realized I was doing more films in 
						Toronto and Alberta than I was in America and it was 
						very disappointing because it’s so great to be able to 
						go to the actual place where the thing takes place. My 
						first experience of it I guess was Days of Heaven (1978) 
						because we shot it in Alberta and it’s supposed to be 
						West Texas. What the hell were we doing in Alberta? It 
						was all about the money, which is kind of sad. I love 
						Alberta, I love the high plains up there and it’s very 
						visually beautiful up there. But it’s not West Texas. If 
						we had shot it in West Texas it might have had a 
						different feel. Probably not as pretty. The idea of 
						taking the actual location of the story and transposing 
						it to another location, it’s heartbreaking.  
						 
						WW: A sense of place is something that’s about to get 
						lost in movies and we wrote Don’t Come Knocking for Elko 
						(Nevada) and we wrote it for Moab (Utah) and we wrote it 
						for Butte. Even for money reasons we could not have made 
						it anywhere else.  
						 
						 
   |