Filmed during October and November
of 1987 around Duluth, Minnesota. Much of the filming
was done inside a pop-up film studio in the Duluth Port
Terminal, designed to look like a waterfront. The movie
also called for a large living room, kitchen and dining
room area that had a 1930s authenticity. The location
manager lucked onto 2 Hawthorne Road in the Congdon
neighborhood, which was owned by William Zinmaster. The
scene of a 100th birthday party celebration took a night
and the next day to film.
Jessica Lange said the idea of making
"Far North" in and around Duluth was Shepard's, not
hers.
''It never had occurred to me. . . . This is the
location Sam wanted. He thought this was perfect. It
really didn't have to do with being my hometown. It was
just a place he had seen and liked very much. . . . And
a lot of it takes place in the woods and he had to come
pretty far north to find the birch forests. He wanted
the lake and everything.
''He started coming up here with me, when we'd come to
the cabin or see my family or whatever. I think there
was something about this area that was very unfamiliar
to him. Most of his plays take place in the West and
Southwest. That's what he's familiar with. But there was
something here that fascinated him and captured his
imagination.
''For somebody who's never grown up in the woods, it's a
very mysterious thing. Even for someone who's grown up
living out in the woods there's something unique and
unknown, something very mysterious about the woods.
That's part of what he wanted to capture in this
movie.''
|
Variety:
In his film directing debut, Sam Shepard forsakes the
fevered elliptical prose flights of his plays, for a
straightforward approach of surprising flatness and
sentimentality that never gets airborne in this
conventional tale of a Minnesota farm family coming to
terms with its past and present in a time of
accelerating change.
Leonard Maltin:
Shepard's directing debut, which he also scripted, is a
pointless, artificial drama about the various members of
a Minnesota family and what happens when patriarch
Durning is almost killed by a wild horse. Good cast is
wasted.
Jay Boyar, Orlando Sentinel:
In creating the directionless "Far North", Shepard
has simply failed to adapt his impressive stage talents
to the task of filmmaking... The distance between
Shepard's intentions and what he has achieved here is
disappointingly vast... At best, "Far North" comes off
like a weak imitation of "Crimes of the Heart", which is
ironic because Shepard is at least as fine a writer as
[Beth] Henley.
Candice Russell, Sun Sentinel:
Simply put, "Far North" is another rambling,
self-indulgent exercise from Sam Shepard, director. A
better actor in other people`s films than a writer-
helmsman of his own pictures, Shepard creates folksy
eccentrics this time around, then takes them absolutely
nowhere.
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times:
"Far North" is a disorganized, undisciplined,
rambling, pointless exercise in undigested material, and
you can't blame the actors, the technicians or the
middle men. This movie fails at the level of writing and
direction. That is a shocking statement to have to make,
because Shepard is a great playwright and a good
screenwriter who has not produced anything remotely this
half-baked elsewhere in his career. Perhaps he directed
"Far North" himself because no other director was
interested. What he might have heard, had he solicited
the advice of an experienced filmmaker, was that he had
no narrative line from beginning to end, no clearly
defined mission for his characters and no urgent reason
for his story to be told. It is a meandering, episodic
series of chapters in the history of a family that needs
professional help, urgently.
Janet Maslin, NY Times:
In ''Far North,'' Mr. Shepard shows himself capable of
making great associative leaps with the camera from time
to time, but the incidental passages are more awkward,
shapeless and uncertain. There is less sense of what the
muted, oblique ''Far North'' actually is than of what it
might have been.
Kim Newman, Film Yearbook:
The film is carefully acted, but it is a bit too meagre
and whimsical for its own good, and the endless dialogue
sequences have very little of the cinema about them.
Graham Fuller, Film Yearbook:
Shepard is no Beth Henley when it comes to delineating
the dreams that motivate women, and the pacing of the
movie is as leaden as its mise en scene.
Sue Heal, Radio Times:
Playwright Sam Shepard's feature film debut as
director stars his real-life partner Jessica Lange.
Despite the fact that Lange is arguably the most
accomplished movie actress of her generation, this still
manages to be a major head-banging exercise in dragging
Freudian clichés through the farm dust of Minnesota. The
cast is impeccable - Tess Harper, Charles Durning,
Patricia Arquette - but Shepard's tediously tangled
script and lumpen direction badly let it down.
|